1.  Kathleen T. Schuler, "The Nonprofit Access Corporation:  A
     Guide to Incorporation," Cable Scan, Volume 7, issue 1
     (Spring 1988) at 1 (hereafter Schuler).

 2.  Id. at 7.

 3.  Id.

 4.  Id.

 5.  Contained in Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs,
     Planning for Cable Communications in Hawaii, 7 volumes
     (1989).

 6.  Id., vol. III, at 66-67.

 7.  Id., vol. III at 61.

 8.  Chapters 92 and 92F, Hawaii Revised Statutes.

 9.  OIP Opinion Letter No. 93-18 (October 20, 1993).

10.  Letter to Kathryn S. Matayoshi, Director, DCCA, from Stella
     Lee, Staff Attorney, OIP, dated November 16, 1995.

11.  Section 314-1, Hawaii Revised Statutes.

12.  The OIP's contention that the access organizations were not
     created by the State does not appear to have taken into
     consideration the state moneys spent hiring experts to
     devise the structure of the boards, the state involvement in
     drafting the access organizations' bylaws, and the
     implementation of the creation of the access organizations
     through the DCCA's hand-picked initial directors.

13.  As of the time this report was prepared, the State had
     contracts only with 'Olelo and H-o'ike.  Contracts with Akaku
     and Na Leo were pending, despite the fact that both entities
     have been producing programs already (in Akaku's case, for
     over two years).

14.  Letter from Jean Y. Aoki, Vice-President, League of Women
     Voters of Honolulu, August 25, 1995.

15.  Comments of Oceanic Cablevision on S.R. 65, S.D. 1, dated
     August 8, 1995, at 12.

16.  Letter from Richard J. Argus, General Manager, Kauai
     CableVision, July 26, 1995.

17.  Letter from Bill Harkins, General Manager, Garden Isle
     Cablevision, July 24, 1995.

18.  Testimony of Akaku on Senate Concurrent Resolution 77 before
     the Senate Committee on Communications and Public Utilities,
     March 21, 1995.

19.  Testimony of 'Olelo on Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 77
     before the Senate Committee on Communications and Public
     Utilities, March 15, 1995.

20.  See, e.g., DCCA, Planning for Cable Communications in
     Hawaii, Vol. 1 (October 1989) at 147-48.

21.  Response from Kathleen Schuler to researcher, dated
     November 13, 1995.

22.  Comments of Oceanic Cable on S.R. No. 65, S.D. 1, August 8,
     1995 at 10.

23.  One local producer assisted the Bureau by forwarding
     information from the Internet.  The researcher contacted a
     number of access centers identified in that email, and also
     asked others in the field for representative access
     organizations.

24.  Telephone interview with Ron Cooper, Access Sacramento, on
     May 30, 1995.

25.  Faxed letter from Alan Bushong, board member, Alliance for
     Community Media and former executive director of Austin
     Community Television, to researcher, September 12, 1995.

26.  Faxed letter from Alan Bushong, board member, Alliance for
     Community Media, to researcher, September 12, 1995.

27.  Telephone interview with Aaron Zinck, Davis Community
     Television, on September 28, 1995.

28.  Telephone interview with Joel Windisch, Larchmont-Mamaorneck
     Community Television, on September 28, 1995.

29.  Telephone interview with Ralph Malvick, Montgomery Community
     Television, October 4, 1995.

30.  Telephone interview with Greg Moore, NorthWest Community
     Television Corporation, September 28, 1995.

31.  Telephone interview with Rene Paine, Public Access
     Television, on September 28, 1995.

32.  Telephone interview with Ann Flynn, Tampa Educational Cable
     Consortium, on October 13, 1995.

33.  Electronic mail from Deborah Vinsel, executive director, on
     August 7, 1995.

34.  Telephone interview with Sam Behrend, Tucson Community Cable
     Corporation, on September 28, 1995.

35.  Telephone interview, Greg Vawter, Waycross Community Media,
     Forest Park, Ohio, on October 13, 1995.

36.  Telephone interview with Fred Strauss, White Plains Cable
     Commission, September 28, 1995.

37.  Id.

38.  Schuler at 8.

39.  If another hurricane, for example, were to hit the State as
     Iniki did, standards would have to be waived.  Iniki had a
     negative impact on H-o'ike's operations.