|
Sunshine Memo 12-4
Written Testimony Submitted by E-Mail
Requester asked for an investigation into whether
the Kauai County Council (Council) violated the Sunshine Law by
its alleged refusal to accept written testimony that Requester submitted
by e-mail concerning an item on the Council’s agenda for its
upcoming meeting.
OIP found that Requester’s e-mail correspondence
to the Council served as written testimony for an upcoming meeting.
If the Council had failed to distribute the testimony, this would
have violated the Sunshine Law’s requirement upon a board
to accept written testimony submitted by the public. The Council’s
apparent omission of Requester’s transmittal e-mail as testimony,
however, was mitigated because, with respect to the four documents
attached to Requester’s testimony, the Council had considered
and made public redacted versions of two of the same documents that
had been provided as testimony by another person and the other two
attached documents were not required to be disclosed in order to
protect the privacy of the government employee named therein.
|