|
UIPA Memo 11-10
AG Opinion Issued to BLNR
Requester asked whether the Office of the Attorney
General (the AG) properly denied Requester’s request under
part II of the UIPA for a copy of an AG opinion issued to the Board
of Land and Natural Resources concerning the transfer of ownership
of a mooring permit by a commercial fishing corporation.
OIP found that the denial was proper under the
UIPA. A review of the opinion makes clear that, in response to requester’s
threatened lawsuit, the AG, serving as the Board’s legal adviser,
was providing its advice and counsel to the Board, its client, regarding
interpretation and application of the governing law concerning permit
transfers. Accordingly, OIP found that the AG opinion may be withheld
under HRS § 92F-13(2) as attorney work product and HRS
§ 92F-13(4) as a record that is protected by law under the
attorney-client privilege provided under Rule 503 of the Hawaii
Rules of Evidence, which is codified at HRS § 626-1.
|