UIPA Memo 11-15
Requester asked whether the University of Hawaii (UH)
properly denied Requester’s request for disclosure of attorneys’
invoices to UH (Invoices) under part II of the UIPA.
OIP found that UH must disclose the Invoices after
redacting information that is protected under one or more of the
UIPA exceptions. Specifically, UH may redact information revealing
privileged attorney-client communications and attorney work-product
that are exempt under one or more UIPA exceptions, and may also
redact individually identifiable information about employees that
falls under the UIPA’s “clearly unwarranted invasion
of personal privacy” exception.