|
Opinion Letter No. 07-01
February 1, 2007
Firearm Permits In response to an inquiry from
the Honolulu Police Department ("HPD"), OIP concluded that firearm
permit information that identifies an individual permit holder by
name or address must be deemed to be "registration data" protected
under § 134-3(b), HRS, and therefore should be withheld under §
92F-13(4), HRS, of the UIPA. Other permit information that could
reasonably identify the individual permit holder (such as the individual's
social security number, fingerprints, and photograph) should also
be segregated and withheld under the UIPA's frustration exception
(§ 92F-13(3)) to maintain the confidentiality of the individual's
identity.
OIP concluded that, under the UIPA's privacy exception
(§ 92F-13(1)), HPD may generally withhold information that allows
the identification of individuals who have been denied permits,
as well as those who did not apply for a permit, who did not complete
the application process, or who were granted a permit, but allowed
it to lapse without acquiring a firearm. OIP noted that circumstances
may alter the usual balance between the individual's privacy interests
and the public interest in disclosure. Thus, HPD must determine,
on a case-by-case basis, whether circumstances diminish the individual's
privacy interest and/or give rise to a heightened public interest
that tips the balance in favor of disclosure.
In both of the above cases, once identifying information
is properly redacted, HPD must disclose the remaining information
in an application or application file unless it falls within another
exception to disclosure.
|